Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of mean MOE values determined by acoustic and ultrasonic methods (N = 21)

From: A novel method to correct for wood MOE ultrasonics and NIRS measurements on increment cores in Liquidambar styraciflua L

Method

Mean (MPa)

Contrast

Difference (MPa)

p value

US360 (a)

18250

A

1620

<10−2

US10 (b)

16100

US360

2150

<10−2

A (b)

16630

US10

530

0.20

  1. US360, MOE measured by the ultrasonic method on 360 mm prismatic bars. US10, MOE measured by the ultrasonic method on 10 mm prismatic bars. A, MOE measured by the acoustic method on 360 mm prismatic bars. a and b, Classification by group, according to Holm’s method
Back to article page

Annals of Forest Science

ISSN: 1297-966X