Skip to main content

Table 2 Average values (±standard deviation) for the timing (number of days) of bud burst (the slope of a linear regression line between first, 50 % and 100 % bud bursts) for conditions with different chilling durations (CD; chilling days) and photoperiod lengths (Photo) and analysis of variance results for the effects of photoperiod (P), chilling duration (C) and interaction between both effects (C × P) on the timing of bud burst

From: Chilling temperature and photoperiod influence the timing of bud burst in juvenile Betula pubescens Ehrh. and Populus tremulaL. trees

Photo (h)

Average values

ANOVA results

CD (days)

Betula pubescens

Populus tremula

Effect

B. pubescens

P. tremula

F (df)

p

F (df)

p

Experiment 1

8

35

15.0 ± 6.4

–

C

55.21 (1)

<0.001

–

–

8

82

3.9 ± 2.5

8.6 ± 2.6

     

12

35

18.3 ± 2.7

–

P

2.94 (2)

0.073

0.67 (2)

0.537

12

82

2.8 ± 0.8

7.3 ± 2.9

     

16

35

8.6 ± 4.3

–

C × P

5.48 (2)

0.011

–

–

16

82

4.4 ± 3.2

9.6 ± 2.3

     

Experiment 2

10

25

–

42.9 ± 19.2

C

2.96 (2)

0.067

22.10 (2)

<0.001

10

53

4.6 ± 1.4

22.4 ± 19.6

     

10

76

6.5 ± 1.2

6.3 ± 2.2

P

2.95 (1)

0.096

3.64 (1)

0.064

16

25

6.5 ± 3.1

32.0 ± 16.0

     

16

53

4.6 ± 2.7

11.1 ± 6.7

C × P

2.95 (1)

0.096

0.94 (2)

0.401

16

76

3.8 ± 1.1

6.3 ± 2.2

     
  1. Significant p values are in bold