Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 4 Variables included in the SDM including their type and variable importance

From: Predicting current and future suitable habitat and productivity for Atlantic populations of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton) in Spain

Type

Variable

Normalized importance

Relative importance

Summarized values for suitable habitat

Mean

Max.

Min.

SD

Climate

BIO1

11.57

100.00

12.96

15.10

8.00

1.00

Climate

BIO03

11.22

93.49

3.94

4.40

3.60

0.14

Climate

BIO04

10.60

81.81

413.34

565.40

307.00

60.44

Climate

BIO16

9.44

59.84

447.94

662.00

241.00

77.91

Climate

BIO15

9.40

59.09

42.26

53.00

27.00

4.77

Soil

BD

9.28

56.85

1274.66

1506.00

1042.00

59.12

Soil

SILT

8.63

44.69

32.42

44.00

20.00

3.85

Soil

R

8.14

35.36

16.02

43.00

1.00

5.48

Terrain

TSI

7.96

31.95

0.00

0.32

− 0.26

0.03

Soil

WRB-LEV1

7.51

23.52

Soil

DB200

6.26

0.00

199.82

200.00

161.00

1.37

  1. To ensure values of variable importance were expressed on a comparable scale for each of the response variable, the scores of all the predictors selected were normalized so that they added up to a unitary value (normalized importance) or were expressed as relative values. Relative importance = (VIM−VIMmin)/(VIMmax−VIMmin)
  2. 1Qualitative variable