Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the ANOVA showing the direct and the interaction effects of RDIc, HBc, and SSc on the three indices of growth response to drought (resistance, resilience, and recovery; n = 269 trees). The Tukey multiple comparisons of means. The number of * corresponds to the p values (*, **, and ***: 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001). See text for details

From: Decreasing stand density favors resistance, resilience, and recovery of Quercus petraea trees to a severe drought, particularly on dry sites

  

Df

Sum Sq

Mean Sq

F value

Pr (> F)

Resistance (Rt)

RDIc

2

2.005

1.0025

12.33

< 0.0000***

HBc

2

5.165

2.5826

31.765

< 0.0000***

SSc

2

0.133

0.0664

0.817

0.4429

RDIc:HBc

3

1.121

0.3737

4.596

0.0038**

RDIc:SSc

4

0.13

0.0325

0.4

0.8088

HBc:SSc

4

0.078

0.0195

0.24

0.9157

Residuals

251

20.407

0.0813

  

Resilience (Rs)

RDIc

2

10.422

5.211

67.346

< 0.0000***

HBc

2

5.168

2.584

33.397

< 0.0000***

SSc

2

0.958

0.479

6.189

0.00238**

RDIc:HBc

3

1.5

0.5

6.464

0.00031***

RDIc:SSc

4

0.691

0.173

2.234

0.06592

HBc:SSc

4

0.641

0.16

2.072

0.08502

Residuals

251

19.422

0.077

  

Recovery (Rc)

RDIc

2

4.91

2.4573

18.267

< 0.0000***

HBc

2

0.85

0.4225

3.141

< 0.0000**

SSc

2

1.14

0.5703

4.24

0.01546**

RDIc:HBc

3

2.85

0.9485

7.051

0.00014***

RDIc:SSc

4

0.84

0.2089

1.553

0.18743

HBc:SSc

4

0.72

0.1808

1.344

0.25414

Residuals

251

33.76

0.1345