Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 8 Stand structural characteristics of beech, mixed (beech-oak), oak and linden forests (means (SD), averaged over the three transects, n = number of plots). Plots dominated by beech: all plots with basal area of F. sylvatica > 66.6%, oak: all plots with basal area of Quercus species > 66.6%, linden: all plots with basal area of T. tomentosa: > 66.6%, mixed: all other forests (except for stands with T. tomentosa > 66.6%) for the three transects (A, B, C). Stem ha−1, DBH, height (h), basal area (BA), stem volume (Vol) and carbon in stem biomass (AGC). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between forest types are indicated by different small letters (one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test)

From: Climate warming-induced replacement of mesic beech by thermophilic oak forests will reduce the carbon storage potential in aboveground biomass and soil

 

Beech (n = 69)

Mixed (n = 106)

Oak (n = 52)

Linden (n = 38)

Stem [ha−1]

636.3 (311.3) a

869.3 (469.8) b

733.4 (267.4) a b

1234.7 (486.4) a b

DBH [cm]

26.8 (14.4) a

21.3 (12.3) b

23.0 (11.4) b

20.1 (9.7) b

h [m]

26.5 (6.2) a

20.5 (7.2) c

17.7 (7.5) b

20.5 (6.7) c

BA [m2 ha−1]

46.2 (3.2) a

41.3 (14.2) b

37.8 (9.5) b

48.5 (13.3) a

Vol [m3 ha−1]

621.9 (211.5) a

499.2 (229.8) b c

446.1 (149.1) c

544.6 (191.8) a b

AGC [Mg C ha−1]

180.9 (61.6) a

137.2 (60.3) b

141.3 (46.7) b

125.3 (41.6) b