Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 8 | Annals of Forest Science

Fig. 8

From: Mapping tropical forest trees across large areas with lightweight cost-effective terrestrial laser scanning

Fig. 8

Comparison between ground-measured and TLS-estimated DBH. a TLS-based versus field measured DBH for 5104 stems, with the TLS-based DBHs estimated using the “xy-range” approach (Fig. 3a). b TLS-based versus field measured DBHs for five hundred randomly selected stems, with the TLS-based DBHs calculated using a semi-automatic approach shown in Fig. 3b and 3c. c TLS-based versus field measured DBHs for large stems (above 1 m DBH as initially estimated by the “xy-range” approach). TLS-based DBHs were still calculated using the semi-automatic approach but every 1 m along the z axis up to 13 m, and the best match with field values was used here

Back to article page