Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.
Fig. 3 | Annals of Forest Science

Fig. 3

From: Responses to defoliation of Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Sophora japonica L. are soil water condition dependent

Fig. 3

Amax, E, Gs, and chl a/b (panels a–d) of R. pseudoacacia and S. japonica grown in different water and defoliation treatments (mean ± SE, n(Amax, E, and Gs) = 3, n(Chl a/b) = 5) at 8 weeks after defoliation. Different uppercase and lowercase letters denote significant differences in each species at p ≤ 0.05 by Duncan’s test, respectively. W1, W2, and W3: 75%, 55%, and 35% of field capacity. D0, D1, and D2: control, 50% defoliation, and 100% defoliation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between species in each drought and defoliation treatment separately with independent sample t-test: **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.05

Back to article page

Annals of Forest Science

ISSN: 1297-966X