Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Annals of Forest Science

Fig. 1

From: Driving mechanisms of productivity stability vary with selective harvesting intensities in a mixed broad-leaved Korean pine forest

Fig. 1

Illustration of how selective harvesting may influence two diversity-dependent (a, b) and a size-dependent (c) regulatory mechanisms of the temporal stability of aboveground biomass productivity in multi-layered mixed forests. The width of the top arrows in each graph reflects the magnitude of the effects. In part a, along the gradient of increasing harvesting intensity (decreasing stand density), the magnitude of species complementarity for biomass production may show a decreasing (dashed blue line). These changes of complementarity further alter the overyielding effect. Part (b) shows how species with different shade tolerances and growth strategies respond to harvesting treatment. The solid lines indicate increased abundance of a pioneer (yellow) and a subordinate light-demanding (blue) tree species, while the dashed line indicates a decrease in the abundance of subcanopy shade-tolerate species (orange). The canopy dominant trees (green) do not show strong reactions (dotted green line). Such changes in community composition may modify the overall asynchronous species dynamics at the community level. Red X indicates tree mortality. Part c shows that selective harvesting reduces the degree of size-asymmetric resource competitions, benefiting the growth of small-sized trees (solid line) over large trees (dashed line), as indicated by a decline in the growth dominance coefficient (GDC)

Back to article page