Driving mechanisms of productivity stability vary with selective harvesting intensities in a mixed broad-leaved Korean pine forest

Table 5 Output from the fits of the generalized least-squares (GLS) models of each stability-predictor relationship. GDC, growth dominance coefficient

Relationship	Model	Coefficient	CI_low	CI_high	P value	AIC
Stability-richness	Non-spatial	0.19	0.10	0.25	0.001	141.07
Stability-richness	Spatial	0.18	0.10	0.24	0.001	142.23
Stability-asynchrony	Non-spatial	0.21	0.13	0.29	0.001	262.41
Stability-asynchrony	Spatial	0.23	0.15	0.30	0.001	267.85
Stability-GDC	Non-spatial	0.51	0.29	0.90	< 0.001	255.88
Stability-GDC	Spatial	0.54	0.30	0.91	< 0.001	260.77
Stability-productivity	Non-spatial	− 0.08	− 0.18	0.02	0.135	270.67
Stability-productivity	Spatial	− 0.07	− 0.17	0.02	0.138	271.75
Stability-harvesting intensity	Non-spatial	− 0.40	− 1.54	0.38	< 0.001	258.35
Stability-harvesting intensity	Spatial	− 0.38	− 1.53	0.38	< 0.001	261.20

ISSN: 1297-966X