Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of ANOVA, LSMean values ± standard deviations (SD) by resistance classes for constitutive chemical compounds, F ratios (degrees of freedom shown as subscript), and p-values are shown

From: The effects of provenance, climate, and chemical defense on the resistance of Pinus pinaster Aiton to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner and Buhrer)

Variable

Resistant classes

Provenances within resistance

Resistant class

Susceptible class

F1,30

P > F

F8,30

P > F

LSMean ± SD

LSMean ± SD

N (%)

0.027

0.928

11.452

< 0.001

0.89 ± 0.18

0.90 ± 0.11

Pol (mg·g−1)

9.561

< 0.01

4.207

< 0.01

40.97 ± 9.63

47.49 ± 7.52

Lip (mg·g−1)

16.741

< 0.001

0.896

0.532

26.93 ± 5.75

33.42 ± 4.04

Tan (mg·g−1)

27.234

< 0.001

3.960

< 0.01

29.00 ± 6.57

38.64 ± 8.21

Mon (mg·g−1)

0.136

0.715

2.806

0.019

70.36 ± 9.50

71.38 ± 10.98

Sta (mg·g−1)

3.774

0.062

2.020

0.078

81.98 ± 17.97

72.91 ± 14.41

  1. Bold type indicates significant differences
  2. N nitrogen, Lip lipid-soluble substances, Pol total polyphenols, Tan condensed tannins, Mon soluble monosaccharides, Sta starch