Skip to main content

Table 5 Evaluation of the contributions of site index (\(SI\)) and periodic site index (\(pSI\)) in the periodic mean annual stand dominant height increment model (\(\Delta H\), Eq. 10) and in the volume increment model (\(\Delta V\), Eq. 11) using (i) the existing SI model of Assmann and Franz (1965) and (ii) the new SI model (Eq. 1) by splitting the data set into training (70%) and validation data (30%)

From: A growth-effective age-based periodic site-index for the estimation of dynamic forest site productivity under environmental changes

Sources

Eq.

SI

Training data

Validation data

\(R^2\)

\(RMSE\)

\(AIC\)

n

\(R^2\)

\(RMSE\)

\(AIC\)

n

Existing SI model

\(\Delta H\) (Eq. 10)

\(SI\)

    

0.743

0.097

−9964

5435

\(pSI\)

    

0.793

0.087

−11,138

5435

\(\Delta V\) (Eq. 11)

\(SI\)

    

0.428

5.022

33,002

5435

\(pSI\)

    

0.471

4.829

32,578

5435

New SI model

\(\Delta H\) (Eq. 10)

\(SI\)

0.742

0.097

−6936

3804

0.744

0.096

−3006

1631

\(pSI\)

0.812

0.083

−8135

3804

0.855

0.072

−3936

1631

\(\Delta V\) (Eq. 11)

\(SI\)

0.442

4.917

22,932

3804

0.406

5.232

10,046

1631

\(pSI\)

0.447

4.896

22,899

3804

0.433

5.112

9970

1631

  1. R2 Coefficient of determination, RMSE Root mean squared error, AIC Akaike information criterion, n Degrees of freedom